|
Art
over the centuries
has been engaged in
exploring and
producing beauty,
but more recently
has had a vexed
relationship with
that concept. In
Daniel Blignaut's
latest body of work:
“A Conversation with
Trees”, his work
unabashedly aims to
achieve aesthetic
beauty by evoking a
primal fascination
with the allure of
gold and the
aesthetic pleasure
of color, pattern
and texture — as
evident throughout
human visual
history. Blignaut's process involves making bold aesthetic statements only to soften them with a multitude of layers, which adds to the eventual complexity of the surface. This has the effect of indicating the passage of time on the canvas itself.
In these latest work,
he returns to the
subject of trees,
which has fascinated
him since childhood
and occurred in his work since the early eighties. Instead of a representational depiction,
Blignaut employs
something similar to
an Iconographic
template to portray
their presence,
complexity, and
majesty. He use
trees as a metaphor
for the human
condition — for
instance, the visual
measure of the
passage of time, the
seasonal cycle of
death and rebirth,
and the diversity of
personalities.
Daniel Blignaut's work is interested in the physicality of trees, and in the way that time, environment and climate impacts the body to produce an enormous visual variety.
Nathalie Maranda’s creative expression moves beyond the traditional antimony of the figuration-abstraction relation. The representational image is often scarcely outlined, but it moves, falters, flows and melts, finally yielding to the painted surface –a dynamic universe which creates and recreates itself into the occurrence, the shape of meaning, through the residue of sculpting organic matter, a method in continuity with her previous explorations.
And, beyond its aesthetic character, Nathalie Maranda’s work posits a space for meditation and the possibility of an encounter. Not simply an encounter of matter and gesture, but also, and above all, an encounter with the spectator - as observer and actor - self-guided, circulating among the clues offered by the artist; appropriating all the possibilities that pile up, one upon the next, from one work to the next, from gestural accumulation, from surfaces wrought of ochre and brown earth tones; celestial, primordial, blues, reds and yellows; set in motion by the artist’s hand, to come alive on the canvas, to be transformed through our gaze.
Richard Heinsohn
began combining
gestural abstraction
with the
appropriation of
objects in his paintings years ago as part of an endeavor to fuse aesthetic values with conceptual insights. The gestural approach has evolved immensely over time and has become more of an intuitively generated array of symbols which vary in form and meaning. During this process
he incorporate a wide variety of small objects such as paint tubes, old toys and discarded gloves into the thick mix of paint, sand, sawdust and painting medium to the point that they cannot be fully perceived from even several feet away but form a narrative of their own up close. This narrative provides a second stage to the viewing experience, allowing the paintings to communicate complex ideas while remaining abstract.
( ) |
 |